February 1, 2012 (New Orleans, Louisiana) — In a randomized trial,  treatment with clazosentan, a still-investigational endothelin receptor  antagonist, reduced the risk of vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid  hemorrhage (SAH) but did not improve functional outcomes.
The authors report that clazosentan, especially at 15 mg/h,  significantly reduced morbidity related to post-SAH vasospasm at 6  weeks, but no effect was seen with the 5 mg/h dose.
In addition, "neither dose improved functional outcomes," noted lead  investigator R. Loch Macdonald, MD, head of neurosurgery at St.  Michael's Hospital at the University of Toronto in Canada, at a press  conference here. He suggested that the 3-fold greater use of rescue  therapy in the placebo arm of the study may have influenced this  outcome.
The new results, from the Effect of Clazosentan on Clinical Outcome  after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Endovascular Coiling trial  (CONSCIOUS-3), were reported at the American Stroke Association's  International Stroke Conference (ISC) 2012. The study was funded by  Actelion Pharmaceuticals.
                         Few Alternatives                    
"We don't have very effective treatments for this complication," Dr.  Macdonald said of vasospasm after SAH. "The treatment in use now  [nimodipine] is very expensive and risky and doesn't work very well, and  about half of the patients suffer permanent problems from it."
In a previous study, CONSCIOUS-1,  clazosentan was shown to reduce angiographic vasospasm after ruptured  aneurysm in a dose-dependent fashion. The current study aimed to assess  whether clazosentan improved vasospasm-related morbidity and all-cause  mortality after aneurysmal SAH.
The CONSCIOUS-3 study was a randomized, double-blind,  placebo-controlled trial that included 571 patients aged 18 to 75 years  with SAH caused by ruptured saccular aneurysm, which was secured by  endovascular coiling. Patients were randomly assigned to receive  intravenous clazosentan 5 mg/h (n = 194), clazosentan 15 mg/h (n = 188),  or placebo (n = 189) for ≤2 weeks.
The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality,  vasospasm-related new cerebral infarct, delayed ischemic neurological  deficit caused by vasospasm, and rescue therapy in the presence of  confirmed angiographic vasospasm. Patients were evaluated for the  endpoint 6 weeks post-SAH and were further assessed centrally by a  blinded critical events committee. The main secondary endpoint was the  extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) at week 12.
CONSCIOUS-3 was halted prematurely after the parallel CONSCIOUS-2 study, in which patients were treated with surgical clipping, showed  only a trend for improvement in the primary endpoint of mortality or  vasospasm-related morbidity at 6 weeks and no improvement in functional  outcomes with clazosentan. The investigators planned a target 1500  patients in CONSCIOUS-3, but ultimately only 577 were enrolled and 571  treated.
                         Higher Dose Associated With Benefits                    
In this trial, a primary composite endpoint event occurred in 27% of  the placebo group compared with 24% of the low-dose clazosentan group  and 15% of the high-dose clazosentan group.
"Despite having less than half of the intended patients in the study,  we were encouraged to see that at a high dose, there was a significant  reduction in vasospasm in patients initially treated with endovascular  coiling," Dr. Macdonald said.
The improvement was significant in the comparison of the 15 mg/h experimental group vs placebo, with an odds ratio of 0.474 (P = .007).  The odds ratio for the 5 mg/h group was 0.786 and was not statistically significant (P = .340).
"When we broke out the 4 components of the primary endpoint, we saw  no significant difference in the death rate, but all the other  components were strikingly reduced in the 15 mg/h group," he observed.
At week 12, mortality rates were similar between groups, but delayed  ischemic neurological deficits diminished in a dose-dependent manner.
| Endpoint | Placebo | Clazosentan 5 mg/h | Clazosentan 15 mg/h | 
| Mortality Rate (%) | 6 | 4 | 6 | 
| Delayed Neurologic Deficits (%) | 21 | 18 | 10 | 
Vasospasm-related new cerebral infarct occurred in 13% of the placebo  group, 16% of the 5 mg/h group, and 7% of the 15 mg/h group. A 3-fold  greater use of rescue therapy was seen in patients receiving placebo  (21%) compared with the 15 mg/h clazosentan dose (7%).
Functional outcomes, however, were not improved with treatment. Poor  functional outcome (GOSE ≤ 4) occurred in 24% of the placebo recipients,  25% of the 5 mg/h group (P = 0.748), and 28% of the 15 mg/h group (P = 0.266).
Treatment-emergent adverse events of specific interest for the  placebo group, the 5 mg/h group, and the 15 mg/h group, respectively,  were lung complications (21%, 36%, 37%), anemia (10%, 13%, 13%), and  hypotension (7%, 11%, 16%).
According to Dr. Macdonald, greater benefits, especially improvements  in neurological outcomes, might be observed with different doses and  administration regimens, and in the absence of vasodilators.  A study is  ongoing in Japan.
Going forward, he said the manufacturer will have several options: to  seek regulatory approval based on the small subset of patients in the  coiling group receiving the higher dose (the 15 mg/h dose was not tested  in the clipped patients); conduct another study using the higher dose  in clipped and coiled patients; and use an endpoint other than GOSE at  90 days.
"GOSE is the traditional endpoint, which is accepted by the FDA, but  it was not developed for patients with SAH and it is not sensitive to  the kinds of deficits they have," he noted. "A better clinical outcome  measure assessing patients' cognition and other functions likely to be  affected by SAH may allow us to demonstrate a clinical benefit."
                         Hindsight 20-20                    
Steven Greenberg, MD, professor of neurology at Harvard Medical  School, Boston, Massachusetts, commented on the problem of vasospasm and  clazosentan as a potential solution. "This is an active area of  research," Dr. Greenberg told Medscape Medical News. "We are  understanding the biology of vasospasm at a higher level, and we hope  that from the biology will come new drug approaches," he said in an  interview.
"But a clinical trial is like steering the QE2," he cautioned. "It's  such an expensive and difficult proposition, and in retrospect there are  things that we might have done differently. If we had to do it again,  the previous CONSCIOUS-2 study might have included the dose that looks  fairly promising, but it did not, because in CONSCIOUS-3, there did seem  to be a dose response," he suggested.
"It would be great, in an ideal world, to have a study of the 15-mg/h  dose, to convince us this effect is real," Dr. Greenberg said. "And it  would be an important advance to have a second drug for preventing  vasospasm. Nimodipine has a significant effect but it's a small effect,  and it does not prevent the majority of vasospasms."
The study was funded by Actelion Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Macdonald  reported receiving research grants from Modest and Actelion  Pharmaceuticals; having an ownership interest in Edge Therapeutic; and  serving as a consultant or advisor for Actelion Pharmaceuticals. Dr.  Greenberg has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
International Stroke Conference (ISC) 2012. Presented February 1, 2012. Abstract #2421                    






0 komentar:
Posting Komentar